<pre id="jlhhl"></pre>

<pre id="jlhhl"></pre>

        <p id="jlhhl"><mark id="jlhhl"><thead id="jlhhl"></thead></mark></p>
          <del id="jlhhl"></del>

            <pre id="jlhhl"><b id="jlhhl"></b></pre><ruby id="jlhhl"></ruby>
            <ruby id="jlhhl"><mark id="jlhhl"></mark></ruby><p id="jlhhl"><cite id="jlhhl"><progress id="jlhhl"></progress></cite></p>

                澳门新葡亰60776平台

                Chinese News Feed

                Immediate execution: can telephone recording be used as legal evidence?

                hqclcn @ 2020/04/28


                ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

                Telephone recording can be used as litigation evidence, but it has certain limitations in legal and effective identification.

                1. when providing evidence such as telephone recordings, the carrier used in the recording should be used as far as possible, such as mobile phones.

                According to the twenty-second provision of the Supreme People's Court on the evidence of civil litigation, investigators should collect information on computers or audio-visual materials such as recording, video recording, etc., and ask the persons to be investigated to provide the original carrier of relevant information. If there is any difficulty in providing the original carrier, duplicates can be provided.

                Recording evidence, if the other party has objection, the court or the appraisal agency will ask you to produce the original recording material, otherwise the recording ability as evidence will be problematic. In addition, after the recording is finished, it should be made into written materials and made into compact discs.

                ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

                2. the telephone recording provided shall not infringe upon the privacy of others.

                Article sixty-eighth of the Supreme People's Court on certain provisions on civil procedural evidence stipulates that evidence obtained by infringing upon the legitimate rights and interests of others or violating the prohibited provisions of law shall not serve as a basis for determining the facts of a case.

                For illegal evidence, such as detention, coercion and other means of infringing upon the legitimate rights and interests of others, or other evidence that has been violated by the law, such as private recording of eavesdropping devices in other houses, the recording will generally be invalid because of the alleged infringement of citizens' housing rights.

                3. telephone recording should be supported by other evidence as far as possible.

                Audio-visual materials with doubtful points can not be regarded as the basis for determining the facts of a case alone. 4. telephone recording should reflect the relationship between rights and obligations as far as possible.

                The recording should be the statement of the debtor himself, not the representative of others. The more complete the recording, the more detailed information about the amount of debt, the time of repayment and so on.

                (picture and text from the Internet, if there is infringement, please contact delete)


                Chinese:立即执行:电话录音可以作为法律证据吗?


                澳门新葡亰60776平台